The Straw That Broke The Donkey’s Back

Today’s Democrat Party has abandoned the playbook of the party that most Americans learned  and understood for years. I just don’t understand how they could have thrown out tried and tested strategic planning schema and replaced it with shortsighted solutions. The Democrat party of the past would have played it up with as much fanfare as possible. They would have never just banned plastic straws. They would have come up with a much more involved plan to steer people into what helped the party the most.

Tweet

The party of the past would have either suggested putting a $1 for tax or deposit on each straw. The tax would be the best solution for the party. They could sell it as a way to implement a straw recycling program. This tax would raise the price of a case of 5000 from about $80 to at least $5080. The Democrats would just consider that the higher cost is just a part of doing business and not something that could affect profits, since profits are evil.

Since straws will require special handling that would require a San Francisco Department of Straw Recycling or SFDOSR, which would require its own bureaucracy. Of course, this would require special routes with custom truck to handle the collected straws for recycling. In addition, unionized workers, with guaranteed permanent employment, would have to collect the straws and additional personnel to run the specially constructed recycling plant built by unionized construction companies. Most of these workers will then be permanent Democrat voters.

Advertisement

Please Support Our Sponsors

Just like with the cigarette tax the higher cost of the straws will force restaurants to quit using straws. The lack of tax income will then cause a crisis for the recycling program, which will require an increase in other taxes, or the more creative solution already built into the plan.

At this point, the tourist bureau and local restaurant association would be demanding relief. The final solution would be to cut the tax by 75% with a mandate that all businesses must provide a straw to all customers with a $.35 deposit and mandatory recycling program. This would have left the workers mostly idle and well paid. While funneling millions of dollars into the coffers of the local elected officials and the Democrat Party. A win-win for the party.

After all the back and forth the average person will have forgotten why the tax was implemented and most of the straws targeted for recycling will be put in the land fill or dumped 200 miles off shore.

Now that is a long-term Democrat Party plan that I recognize.

Tweet

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
©2018 Pedro Sykes - Some Rights Reserved

Ink by the Barrel

A famous quote credited to both Mark Twain and publicist William I. Greener, Jr. is often repeated to silence people who are attacked by the press: ‘Never argue with a man who buys ink by the barrel’. For years, this has been the basic means of the press steamrolling over anyone who opposed their agenda. This ability was somewhat contained when the press was decentralized nature of ownership. This allowed for a more balanced delivery of the news.

Tweet

Over the years, the delivery of the news has changed and the newspaper industry went through a consolidation of ownership as radio and television news took its toll on readership. Then with the growth of the Internet put pressure on both. However, even before the Internet, pressure from 24-hour cable news channels changed the dynamics of reporting news and greater competition to be first to the air. In addition, the major networks started the consolidation of their news into the entertainment divisions. This made them more profit conscious with less concern about integrity of the content as long as they produced viewers for it. Closely following this change in attitude concerning content was even more consolidation of ownership into fewer hands.

With the advent of the Internet and most of the major news providers still unable to find ways to make a profit from this technology, has weakened much of the old guard in the news business. This has emboldened more people to challenge this, once considered, invulnerable powerhouse news organizations. Do not get me wrong. The major broadcast news organizations still have many views. However, their numbers come from the older generations, which is not a growing market. So this does not bode well for their future.

Advertisement

Please Support Our Sponsors

This week’s announcement oflayoffs at The New York Daily News only highlights the dire straits in which the print media finds itself. No longer does the old guard possess the power it once wielded with reckless abandonment. The once mighty daily newspapers that now look more like information pamphlets and are a pale shadow of themselves.

From this weakness and lack of integrity emerged Donald Trump. He has shown that the press no longer has those once feared barrels of ink. Polls show that over the years, trust in the media continues to fall among the American people. This is even highlighted more from the constant attacks coming from a news media that seems much more aligned with the government bureaucracies than the health and stability of the United States as a whole.

For far too long, many politicians who opposed the media's agenda, feared the press and their long arms. They feared that if they did not accept whatever the media said and did, that they face exclusion from the conversation or attacked to the point of destruction. Daily the president face these tactics. However, he has turned the tables constantly. He fearlessly not only fights back against their attacks, he turns the tables by excluding them and withholds their access to information by using Twitter to bypass their ability to control the narrative.

He has demonstrated that he is a master of media and a genius at communicating with his supporters and the American people. Now starved from direct access, the once proud masters of information delivery find themselves shrinking from the lack of the valuable info that feeds their Progressive machines. His overt media coup has help to expand the new American Political Information Age. This has tamped down the gradual century old Progressive/Socialist march to overturn much of the Constitution and the freedoms enjoyed by Americans. He has been so successful that the Democrat Socialist has had to unmask themselves in an attempt to rally their forces, as the media is no longer dependable to control the narrative.

Tweet

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

©2018 Pedro Sykes - Some Rights Reserved

Roseanne Roseanne Roseanne

With all the reports of ABC and the rush to cancel the new Roseanne Show, I have to say that I believe that in the end this will be good for Trump supporters and America as a whole. Now before you hit the back button or close the tab let me explain. I believe, that like many actors, she is a self-promoting, self-serving, actor. She only cares about what whatever she believes will keep her in the spotlight. I fear that she, and her show, would have been only a fair weather friend.

Tweet

To begin with, I must be honest and say that I never watched the Roseanne Show. I refuse to watch ABC, NBC or CBS network television. It is just has a lot to do with the political slant of their so-called news programs and how it creeps into of their programming. However, beyond that I can say that I never watched her show in its last iteration. The broadcast occurred after I began to look for other entertainment options. Therefore, I am not a critic of her acting or of the content of these productions.

I can only base my comments on what I have read or what others have said about its contents. I am not interested in her earliest show. I did find it very interesting that so many people became so enamored with the Roseanne Show when it returned. I just find the contents of her new show to be quite interesting.

Looking at the actual character of the lead actor who is the namesake of the program, my interest was piqued further. It should goes without saying that Roseanne Barr has always been a controversial person. She started her career as a stand-up comedian, billing herself as a domestic goddess. This persona brought her media attention, late night show airtime, and then her first prime time show. Her folksy comedy hit a nerve with many Americans and feed her popularity.

Advertisement

Please Support Our Sponsors

Roseanne is a wild card. Some of her past publicity stunts has been hard for me to explain, other than they were just that: publicity stunts. Her “2012 Presidential run” with Cindy Sheehan may have been just a way to sell a movie idea. However it the stance she pushed were socialist solutions. Her beliefs would seem to be far from the policies implemented so far by the Trump Administration.

Although her character declares her support for President Trump from the beginning of the reboot of her show, the writers for the show are liberals. My belief is that the end game could have been to use any reason to turn the narrative to the negative. I truly don’t believe that the people working on her show would have not tried to use her popularity to undercut the president. The progressives are pulling out all stops to turn back the hands of time and restore the damage done by Obama. It seems thou that Roseanne herself may have killed this plan by accident. Her tweet that caused the firestorm may have been her attempt to convince more of the show fans that she was on their side and it backfired. But the Progressive movement has been shattered so badly that they are feeding on each other. President Trump has outsmarted them at almost every turn.

This episode is not over. I just hope that if I am correct in my hypothesis, that it is just another sign that we are closer to draining the Washington swamp to the point where it can never regain this type of power again.

Tweet

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.




©2018 Pedro Sykes - Some Rights Reserved